Need help to get started, get in touch
Make a complaint Search

BBRS Reporting Data – as of the close of business 30 September 2022

31 October 2022

As of 30 September 2022, the BBRS has reached 44 settlements of which 17 were the result of adjudications and 27 were settled directly between the parties following BBRS involvement. Of those resolved directly, 4 cases were resolved via conciliation, and a further 2 were successfully mediated.

Of the total of 862 cases registered (from go live 15th Feb 2021 to 30 September 2022) we now have 97 live cases being worked on. The BBRS continues to resolve disputes, and progress has been made both in adjudication results and in facilitated settlements, however the overall case volume is not what was expected at launch. The BBRS commissioned in depth research conducted by Bayes Business School which suggests that the total number of eligible case registrations over 3 years is likely to be closer to 1,400, rather than the 6,000 anticipated at the time the scheme went live.

The BBRS will leave no stone unturned in encouraging eligible customers to have their business banking complaints resolved for free, and thanks to some updates to the BBRS website it is now easier than ever to register. The BBRS has resumed its advertising efforts to ensure as many eligible SMEs are aware of the BBRS prior to the closure of the historical scheme to new applications on 14 February 2023.

Our adverts are also focussed on encouraging SMEs owners who may have a contemporary banking complaint (from after 2019) to register these with us to have their complaints reviewed for free.

We continue to test and innovate in the way we engage potential customers through the website in order to capture registrations. Potential customers are now prompted to request a call back after checking their eligibility or starting the registration process if they try to exit the system before registering. We are monitoring the impact of this intervention.

1 – Count of registrations

The total number of cases registered with the BBRS. These figures do not consider eligibility or account for duplicates.

Total Previous month Difference
Historic 504 499 5
Contemporary 174 168 6
Unestablished date of complaint 184 179 5
Total 862 846 161
    1. Number of cases registered with the BBRS between 1-30 September.

2 – Case Status

Cases may be closed for a variety of reasons, for example the removal of duplicate cases, withdrawals or ineligibility.

Total Previous month Difference
Live1 97 99 -2
Closed2 765 747 18
Total 862 846 16
  1. Live includes all active cases regardless of eligibility. This includes cases to be allocated. As of 30 September 2022 there were 9 cases awaiting allocation.
  2. Cases now closed.

3 – Eligibility

The BBRS treats all cases as eligible until we have established the facts relating to each complaint. When a complaint is first assembled, information is collected to check eligibility.

Total
:

Live cases progressing currently as eligible1

Total :

87

:

Live cases assessed as ineligible2

Total :

10

:

Closed cases ineligible3

Total :

125

:

Closed cases eligible4

Total :

6

:

Closed cases non-eligibility reasons5

Total :

634

:

Total

Total :

862

  1. As eligibility is under review throughout the entire BBRS process, most live cases appear in this category.
  2. The number of cases found to be ineligible and remaining live, because the customer or bank may be appealing, they might be being considered for the concessionary case approach or pending closure.
  3. The number of cases found to be ineligible for the BBRS through formal Eligibility Assessments that have completed their journey (i.e. the outcome can no longer be appealed).
  4. The number of cases found to be eligible for the BBRS through formal Eligibility Assessments that have completed their journey (i.e. the outcome can no longer be appealed). Eligible cases that did not require a formal Eligibility Assessment are not in this category.
  5. The number of cases that have completed their journey for reasons unrelated to eligibility.

4 – Reasons for Ineligibility

The table below captures the reasons for ineligibility, not the number of ineligible cases. A case may have multiple reasons for being found ineligible. This also captures instances where a case has not received a formal Eligibility Assessment, but where a customer chooses to withdraw a case because of its ineligibility.

:

Appears the case was eligible for the Financial Ombudsman Service

Total :

93

:

At the time the customer complaint was referred to the bank, the business appears not to meet the required BBRS financials

Total :

77

:

Settled

Total :

23

:

Independent Review

Total :

25

:

Part of the case is time barred1

Total :

14

:

The acts or omissions occurred before 2001

Total :

12

:

Bank complained about is not a participating bank

Total :

8

:

The case has been the subject of a court ruling

Total :

13

:

Bank complained about is not based in the UK (or the act or omission did not occur in the UK)

Total :

4

:

The complaint is subject to a live litigation

Total :

3

:

Total

Total :

272

  1. The complaint was not brought to the bank within the time limits (in general, more than six years after the act or omission complained of or three years after the customer became aware of the act or omission).

5 – Concessionary Cases

If a case falls outside the BBRS’ eligibility criteria, the BBRS may still be able to consider it provided that we, the customer and the bank all agree.

Total
:

Presented to bank1

Total :

33

:

Taken forward2

Total :

7

:

Not taken forward3

Total :

19

:

Bank response pending

Total :

7

  1. The number of cases where the BBRS has written to the bank to seek their agreement to consider a case falling outside the BBRS’ eligibility criteria.
  2. The number of cases where the bank has agreed that the BBRS can consider a case falling outside the BBRS’ eligibility criteria under the concessionary case process.
  3. The number of cases where the bank has not agreed that the BBRS can consider a case falling outside the BBRS’ eligibility criteria under the concessionary case process.

6 – Determinations

Both parties to a complaint have the opportunity to respond to a Provisional Determination before the resultant Determination is issued. Any responses to the Provisional Determination will be taken into account before the issuing of the Determination.

Determinations1
Total Provisional Determinations issued2 36
Total resultant Determinations issued3 34
Outcomes (closed cases only)4
Upheld 3
Partially upheld 16
Not upheld 7
Total 26
  1. These figures account for all determinations issued.
  2. All eligible cases have a Provisional Determination, which is like a draft outcome, available for comments from both parties.
  3. After a set timeframe and any further submissions from either party, a Provisional Determination becomes a resultant Determination.
  4. These figures account for all cases that have completed their journey (i.e. the outcome can no longer be appealed).

7 – Eligibility Appeals

Total
Appeal notices received 63
Appeal notices denied1 48
Appeal notices being considered by the panel 13
Appeals notices pending 2
  1. The BBRS can only consider an Appeal that meets the permissible grounds for appealing an outcome. If an Appeal does not meet the permissible grounds, it will not be considered.

8 – Awards (closed cases only)1

Total
Financial awards2 17
Non-financial awards 9
Total 26
  1. These figures account for all cases that have completed their journey (i.e. the outcome can no longer be appealed). This figure does not include any settlements made via non-adjudicative alternative dispute resolution or direct settlement as these are confidential between the bank and the customer.
  2. This also captures any financial awards issued for Distress and Inconvenience, regardless of whether a complaint is substantively upheld.